ANSI continues advancements on SSL chromaticity standard (MAGAZINE)
Jianzhong Jiao describes the work of a new ad hoc group within ANSI that is contemplating how to accommodate the perceptions and preferences of humans in terms of the chromaticity of white light relative to the black-body locus.
JIANZHONG JIAO describes the work of a new ad hoc group within ANSI that is contemplating how to accommodate the perceptions and preferences of humans in terms of the chromaticity of white light relative to the black-body locus.
The newly published 2015 version of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) LED lighting chromaticity standard, ANIC C78.377-2015, incorporates support for new LED lighting products in the lower correlated color temperature (CCT) range - for example, 2500K and 2200K. The new version also provides guides for the LED makers and users with higher color consistency with the recommended four-step MacAdam ellipse equivalent quadrangles and circles. But the ANSI mission is based on continuous improvement. And a new ad hoc group has formed at ANSI to work toward recognition of the perceived or preferred white colors below or above the black-body locus.
The ANSI chromaticity standard is a communication tool used between LED makers and users, standardizing the white color variation and tolerance for indoor lighting applications. We covered the new standard in detail in an article published in February 2015.
FIG. 1. At LRC, scientists conducted color rendering experiments on subjects' perception of the whiteness of illumination when in the presence of white surroundings with or without colored objects.
Source: Lighting Research Center.
During the development of the ANSI chromaticity standard, the experts took a logical approach to determine the targeted CCT center-points that form a white curve by connecting the black-body locus in the lower CCTs to the daylight of illuminant D65. So far, in the 2015 version of the ANSI chromaticity standard, the white curve covers the CCT range from 2200K to 6500K. The tolerance from the white curve, or the color consistency, is specified using the nominal CCTs, fixed or flexible, with the deviations. The deviations are described by either the seven-step or four-step MacAdam ellipse equivalent quadrangles or circles. By using these quadrangles or circles, LED makers can further determine the LED binning methods or themes that may efficiently use the yields of the LED products; therefore, this standard is also widely used for LED makers to establish the LED color-binning basis.
What is white?
The quadrangle tolerances form a continuous white region from 2200K to 6500K on the chromaticity diagram, making the LED binning specification relatively easier. Within the region, the binning grids can be formed by dividing the region with lines that are parallel to the white curve and to the Duv (or Judd) lines, in which Duv is the distance from the black-body locus on CIE 1960 (u, v) coordinates. The grid size can be a three-step or smaller MacAdam ellipse equivalent, depending on the degree of color consistency needed in an application. Circular tolerances can be challenging for binning LEDs, but with advances in today's technology, LEDs can be binned in a circular fashion as well. In all cases when specifying the tolerances, the location of the targeted or center-points of the nominal CCTs, also known as the white curve, has long been a debatable point because we can't answer how human eyes see white light, and whether or not the ANSI white curves are really white.
In 2009, when ANSI started the first revision of what would be the updated 2011 standards, ANSI C78.377-2011, the committee requested research be conducted by the human factor and vision experts to determine the white curve. In response to the ANSI committee's request, the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Lighting Research Center (LRC) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Optical Radiation Group in the Sensor Science Division each conducted independent research studies. Although the same goal was used in defining where the white curve is located on the chromaticity diagram, the researchers used two different approaches. The LRC approach was to ask test subjects for perceived whiteness while looking at white surroundings with or without colored objects (Fig. 1). The NIST approach was to ask the subjects for preferred white light in illuminating surrounding colored objects.
FIG. 2. Class A Color lighting recommendations for chromaticity tolerance (left) and CRI/GAI combination (right) for retail applications as designated by the LRC experiment.
Source: Lighting Research Center.
Perceptions and preferences
The LRC study described the results of a series of psychophysical experiments that more precisely measured subjective perceptions of white illumination from light sources of different CCTs. "Generally, perceptions of untinted white illumination for sources with high CCTs (above 4000K) are associated with chromaticities that fall above the black-body locus. In contrast, perceptions of untinted white illumination for sources with low CCTs (below 4000K) are associated with chromaticities that lie well below the black-body locus," according to the LRC (Fig. 2).
The NIST study (Fig. 3) described a series of vision experiments that were "conducted with 18 subjects on their response to Duv. The results show that Duv of approximately -0.015 [below black-body locus] on average is perceived as the most natural. This Duv level is outside the ranges specified by existing [ANSI chromaticity] standards. This indicates that new lighting products having a more preferred chromaticity than the current products may be possible."
As a result, the two research teams published their findings and each presented a white curve - a perceived white curve and a preferred white curve. The perceived white curve is about -0.01 of the Duv value below the black-body locus in the lower CCT range, from 2700K to 3500K. Then the white curve is bending upward to +0.006 of Duv in the higher CCT of 6500K. The preferred white curve is approximately -0.015 of the Duv value below the black-body locus throughout 2700K to 6500K. One interpretation of both sets of research suggests that subjects would assume that a pink hue is whiter, while one result suggests if the light is cool white, the subjects thought that a green hue is whiter.
Color preference or perceived color is subjective. It depends on the light level, the surrounding environment, or even the observer's cultural background. The ANSI chromaticity standard is intended to be objective by giving the LED users a specification of color variation and consistency so the white color of indoor illumination can be communicated among LED makers and users with a simple language. Over years of practice with ANSI C78.377, ANSI's approach for defining a white curve is accepted as the most logical approach and is independent of the light level.
Accommodating the research
Initially, the ANSI committee believed that the RPI and NIST results were somewhat inconsistent and the ANSI white curve definition should not be altered. Recently, the committee recognized that for the perceived or preferred white, it can be beneficial if ANSI chromaticity specifications provide guidance or recommendations. The recommendation for perceived or preferred white light is the basis for the planned update to ANSI C78.377.
In these two previous research projects, the observers' input to the low CCTs, 2500K and 2200K, were not studied. Even though both sets of research results indicated a more pink white is common in the low CCT range, it did not explain how human eyes see the whiteness in very warm white or yellow-hued light illumination.
The experts in the ANSI ad hoc group have agreed that fundamentals of the ANSI C78.377 - including a defined ANSI white curve, nominal CCTs, and associated tolerances in quadrangle or circular fashion should remain unchanged. The update is needed to add to the preferred or perceived white center-points curves. Without giving users the conclusively fixed targeted center-points, an approach similar to the flexible nominal CCTs can be used.
FIG. 3. Results of the NIST experiment plotted on ANSI C78.377 chromaticity specifications for SSL products. NIST results were developed according to the most preferred white points in a typical interior room environment with various colored objects, when the subjects were fully adapted to the illumination.
Source: Y. Ohno and M. Fein for National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
In the current standard, the center-points curve is described by a mathematical expression of Duv. The mathematical expression consists of the variable Tx - indicating CCT value, two coefficients, and one constant. By varying the constant, the location of the center-points curve can be moved to below the black-body locus with negative Duv values, or above the black-body locus with positive Duv values. The moving distance is measured by the Duv value. Below the black-body locus it appears to be a pink white, and above the black-body curve it appears to be a yellow white for warm white and green white for cool white. The center-points curve can be moved with a recommended increment and a defined range. Beyond this range, the color of light is no longer accepted as white. For any given center-points curve within the range, the tolerance can be calculated using the existing seven-step or four-step MacAdam ellipse equivalent quadrangles and circles. This approach may be called flexible Duv, similar to the flexible CCT.
The ANSI committee's work for continuous improvement of the chromaticity standard is a great indication of how the standard and lighting technology and applications are closely related and how the interested parties collaborate. LED lighting is an evolving technology and user input for preferred or perceived effects, as well as other human-centric information, is still in the stage to be gathered, analyzed, and implemented. The standard development community has been actively engaged in this dynamic cycle from technology to product to standardization, and then further improvement for the next cycle.
DR. JIANZHONG JIAO is an independent consultant for LEDs and lighting technologies. He is an internationally recognized lighting expert. He has been actively involved in LED and LED lighting standard development activities, technical conferences, and industry consortia. He serves as the past chair of the SAE Lighting Committee, past chair of NGLIA, and past chair of the NEMA SSL Technical Committee. In IESNA he serves as the treasurer of the Testing Procedures Committee, member of the Roadway Lighting Committee, vice chair of the Computer Committee, and vice chair of the Light Source Committee. He is the vice chair of the ANSI SSL Light Source Working Groups, chair of the ASABE Electromagnet Radiation for Plants Committee, a member of the Standard Technical Panel of UL8750, and a member of the standard committees in IEEE, CIE-USA, SEMI, and JEDEC. He is the organizer and chair for SAE World Congress Lighting Technology Conference, a member of the Organizing Committee and chair of SPIE SSL Symposium, and a member of the Technical Panel of Strategies in Light. He can be reached at email@example.com.