|
|
| | Energy Star Luminaires specification requires comments | | 15 Jun 2010 | | Comments for the proposed Energy Star specifications for Luminaires are due later this month. | A webinar on the proposed Energy Star Luminaires specification was hosted last week (June 8, 2010) by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The webinar presentation materials can by downloaded from the Energy Star Luminaires website.
The first draft of the new Energy Star specifications for Luminaires was unveiled in May.
Comments for the first draft are due via email no later than Monday, June 21, 2010. Comments should be submitted to luminaires@energystar.gov, with “ENERGY STAR Luminaires First Draft Comments” in the subject line.
The proposed timeline for this Energy Star specification revision process is as follows:
- Luminaires Draft 1 release: May 7, 2010
- Luminaires Draft 1 comment period close: COB June 21, 2010
- Luminaires Draft 2 release: July 2010, followed by a comment period
- Luminaires Draft 3 release: August 2010, followed by a comment period
- Luminaires Final specification: September 2010
- Luminaires specification effective date: June 2011
EPA said that many questions were addressed during the webinar, but anyone with additional questions can contact Alex Baker (tel. 202-343-9272).
| | COMMENTS | | Name: downey Posted: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:06 |
| I sent my comments into Energy Star last month "I don't think you should consider Metal Halide , Ceramic metal halide, high pressure sodium and halogen as a energy star qualified technology. The use of masking devices like motion and photo sensors only distracts from the mission of promoting the most energy efficient products. Please consider carefully the technologies of Induction and Plasma, make room for them in your consideration. If a product like CFL and florescent bulbs require disposal as a hazards material please make sure the manufactures disclose this in all marketing and packaging labeling. Thank you for your kind consideration." I don't expect this will be considered. |
| | | |