LEDs MAGAZINEOUTDOOR LIGHTINGINDOOR LIGHTING
LOGIN | SUBSCRIBE
LEDs Magazine
   HOME   ARTICLESNEWSPRODUCTSBUYERS GUIDEEVENTSADVERTISECONTACT US
MAGAZINENEWSLETTERSJOBSTOPIC CENTERRESOURCE CENTER
 INDUSTRY NEWS
< Previous  Next >  Contents (October 2010)
Share |
Lack of action on LM-79 allows companies to exploit loophole
26 Oct 2010
Despite minor changes to labelling requirements for LED-based MR16 lamps, consumers will still be confused, write Tim Whitaker and Brian Owen.
Imagine this scenario. You don't know much about lighting, but you know you need a 12V MR16 lamp. You head to The Home Depot because you've seen lots of advertising from about their new EcoSmart range of LED lamps. You buy an LED-based MR16, which is made by Lighting Science Group Corp. (LSGC).

The Lighting Facts label for this product (ECS16 WW FL) says you'll get 295 lumens from it. You take it home, pop it into the waiting socket and…the output is much less than 200 lumens. Around two-thirds the light output you expected.

What do you do? Live with it? Ask for a refund? Chalk it up to experience and go back to CFLs? Become a lighting expert so you don't get fooled again? Contact the Federal Trade Commission?

The problem here is all related to AC and DC operation. As we explained in our article "AC-DC rocks the boat for LM-79 and LED replacement lamps", MR16s can operate from either AC or DC, but the vast majority of lamps will be connected to an AC supply.

However, the light output when operated at 12V DC can be significantly higher than the value when operated at 12V AC, as was the case with this LSG lamp. Pretty much everyone taking the lamp home will experience the lower value of light output, because they will almost certainly connect the lamp into an AC infrastructure.

But guess what? LSG has used the much higher, DC-measured test results on its Lighting Facts label, rather than the AC numbers.

Once the issue came to light, the Lighting Facts program acted quickly and said that all manufacturers must state on their label whether the data was measured at AC or DC. The Lighting Facts website entry for the ECS16 WW FL product now carries the text “tested at 12V DC,” and similar text will appear on the packaging of new lamps.

But how does that help consumers? The answer is that it doesn't; despite the best intentions of Lighting Facts, it just adds to the confusion.

Most consumers will not know whether their MR16 will be connected to DC or AC at home. Most will not be able to compare two sets of data when one is measured at 12V AC and the other at 12V DC. Most will just look for the highest number, without understanding the small print.…but if the number is measured at DC there is very little chance they will ever actually see that level of light output.

Both LSG (see Footnote 1) and The Home Depot are happy to hide behind the changes made by Lighting Facts. A spokesperson from The Home Depot told us that the store “will place signs in the stores that communicate the change [to Lighting Facts label] in an effort to make sure our customers have the latest information.”

Of course, there's nothing to stop LSG publishing the AC-measured test values on its Lighting Facts labels, and The Home Depot could insist this is done to avoid its customers being given misleading information.

So why are DC-measured numbers used at all? Because the LM-79 testing protocol apparently allows MR16 lamps to be tested at either AC or DC. LM-79 says that “the SSL product under test shall be operated at the rated voltage (AC or DC) according to the specification of the SSL product for its normal use.” Since 12V MR16 LED lamps can be used with AC or DC, this wording allows manufacturers to test at either AC or DC.

The IESNA technical committee responsible for LM-79 is evaluating whether it could, or should, change the wording of LM-79 to help clarify this situation. However, feedback from IES suggest they would prefer programs such as Lighting Programs and Energy Star to be proscriptive (possibly, for example, not allowing DC test results for MR16s). But the programs do not see this as being part of their role.

Speaking of Energy Star, the approval of MR16 lamps was temporarily put on hold while EPA assessed the problem. As explained in Footnote 2, EPA has also come up with an approach which both relies on the changes to Lighting Facts and may, in some cases, require additional small print.

So, in the (hypothetical) case where an MR16 might qualify for Energy Star when tested at DC, but would not qualify when tested at AC, the lamp package needs to say "incompatible with AC" or similar. Again, this creates the potential for consumer confusion.

We mentioned the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) earlier in this article, and it's worth noting that, in September of this year, the FTC sued Lights of America over deceptive claims for LED lamps. The FTC said that LOA and its principals had been misleading consumers by exaggerating the light output and life expectancy of its LED bulbs. This action was taken even though, in October 2009, LOA issued a recall notice to customers that had bought its products in Costco, a major retail store. We wait to see what – if any – action The Home Depot will take.

*** What action should be taken, and by whom? Please POST A COMMENT using the button at the bottom of this page. ***

Footnote 1: Statement from LSG

Lighting Science Group Corporation told us: “The packaging on all new shipments of MR16s will be updated as a result of recent labeling changes by Lighting Facts. Since this adjustment just occurred, Lighting Facts is not asking Lighting Science Group to update existing packaging that's already on the market. However, Lighting Science Group is working with Home Depot to place signs in the stores that communicate the change in an effort to make sure our customers have the latest information. All of Lighting Science Group’s marketing materials for the MR16 have been updated and the company’s LM-79 report for the bulb does state that it was 12 volt DC tested by an independent laboratory approved by the US Department of Energy’s CALiPER program.”

Footnote 2: Statement from EPA on Energy Star

Alex Baker, who runs the EPA Energy Star for Lighting program, told us: "The Lighting Facts label is the primary vehicle for informing the consumer about Energy Star qualified MR16 integral LED lamp performance, as it is required on product packaging for Energy Star qualified lamps not covered by FTC lamp labeling requirements. That program has adjusted their label requirements to reflect the type of input power provided during testing, which will be reflected on the packaging of Energy Star qualified lamps."

In addition to the Lighting Facts change, EPA is addressing the issue with reference to page 8 of the Energy Star specification for integral LED lamps. This states that the "lamp package must clearly state any known incompatibility."

Baker said: “If a qualified lamp operating on AC or DC does not comply with requirements, that is also an application exception which should be detailed by the manufacturer. Therefore, on the lamp packaging (not on enclosed materials, not on a referenced website), language similar to the following should be included: 'Not intended for AC operation' or 'Not intended for operation on AC transformers' or 'Not for use with AC transformers'...where 'DC' could be substituted for 'AC', as applicable."

"Language in the LED MR-16 Lamps Intended for use on Low-Voltage Circuits section (also page 8) supports this, as that section explains that incompatibility shall be detailed on packaging, while compatibility may be detailed on a website."

About the Author 
Tim Whitaker is the Editor of LEDs Magazine.

Brian Owen, a contributing editor of LEDs Magazine, is also the Program Advisor to greenTbiz, which facilitates the LED City Toronto initiative. He is actively involved in the development and operation of energy conservation programs for government, municipalities and utilities and specializes in capacity building, commercialization and market transformation. greenTbiz, an ENERGY STAR, Lighting Facts and L Prize Partner, provides energy conservation and environmental awareness programs to the small business sector in Toronto, Canada.

COMMENTS
Name: jonny Posted: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:10
One simple solution would be to insist that all LED lamps that are capable of running on AC or DC would need to specify the lumens in both cases with a comment suggestion typical use. e.g.
294 Lm DC
189 Lm AC (typical application)
Name: rdcarlson Posted: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:10
Specifying whether DC or AC current is used for testing is a good start to addressing the problem. The problem of course is getting the average consumer up to speed on SS lighting. However, I'm not sure it addresses the issue at hand: the average consumer isn't going to know heads or tails when it comes to AC vs. DC or even how to quantify how 200 lumens translates to "light". Probably need something simpler...e.g. Produces light 78% equivelent to a 60 watt bulb.
Name: barrycwhite Posted: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:10
It can be very hard, and at times "deceiving" when trying to SIZE lamp brightness levels. I feel manufacturers should state not only lumen levels, as they relate to LEDs, but they nearest incandascent wattage equivalent,(because that is what the public is MOST familiar with), before spending money on a lamp which in most cases, can be 8-10 times the cost of the conventional incandescant lamp. Similiar to CFL comparison wattages to incandescants.
Name: axelh Posted: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:10
This DC trouble does not surprise me. I wrote to the DOE months ago about them characterizing MR16's as lamps that were driven by AC and DC. Yes, they can be driven by DC, but I dared them to show me a DC application other than the odd motor home or boat application where the operator has switched from the 120V generator to battery power. Or maybe a surgeon with a headlight and a portable DC power pack? I kept wondering about where they got their information. You are correct, the vast majority of MR lamps is powered by AC transformers, and to make things worse, many are now electronic with minimum load requirements. This does not matter with halogen lamps, but many LED MR products will not work consistently with AC transformers, most of which are rated at 50-60W. Case in point: Many markets and big box retailers have a "HALLMARK" section with 10-20 MR16 fixtures lighting up the display with 24" bent arms reaching out into the aisle with the lamp holder angled back at the display. Of course, each fixture has its own AC electronic transformer. This would be a perfect application for LED retrofits, as these lamps often burn 24/7. Having replaced the halogen lamps with 3-5W LED lamps seemed simple enough, but about a third of the lamps would not light as the 60W AC transformers did not "recognize" the load. None of the lamps were defective. Once 12VDC powers supplies were installed, the lamps worked beautifully and reliably. Click on the link below for more ranting on this and related topics. http://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/prod_development/new_specs/downloads/integral_leds/Topaz_Lighting_and_Electric_IntegralLEDLampComments.pdf
Name: robert mueller Posted: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:10
Curiously the obvious solution is not clearly mentioned; simply require every lamp which is appropriate both AC and DC to be marked in a clear way. No small print, no obscure terminology, just give the lumens output for each type of source. I do wonder what happens if the lamps run on high frequency transformers; do these always just translate the instantaneous AC input voltage to a higher frequency version modulated, complete with line frequency modulation, or do some attempt to regulate the light of a halogen lamp and so produce a result differing from expectations if they are believed to behave as simple line frequency transformers?
Name: arfta Posted: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:10
Obvious solution is to mark both AC & DC lumen output on the packaging, and the government should administer an advertising campaign to educate the public. If the industry leaves the education up to the retailers then who knows what deceptive information they'll come up with to make a quick buck - in the end this just damages the SSL industry and slows the take-up of the new technology.
Name: george tang Posted: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 06:10
My suggestion about this DC/AC issue is to demand the stores to demonstrate a lit up MR16 with DC and AC, the consumer can easily see the difference and make their choice - in this case, sales will definitely drop drastically!
Thing is - who dares breaking their own bowl!
There should be some kind of independent umpire, say Energy Star, who should set up measures to determine the lifespan of the LED products on real time burn-up terms, to verify each mfr's product's actual lifespan = 70% or 80% and light shift during the course - in a professional way to save the fame of LEDs or else, outcome I anticipate will be even worse than the CFLs as LED magazine reported ages ago!
Name: lightingj Posted: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:10
The solution needs to consider who will buy these at retail. The government making PSA’s to teach what a lumen is and the difference between AC & DC is probably not the answer. Just like any product, there are good and there are bad. Manufactures who are in it for the short term will always try to cheat, but usually get caught. Besides, the average consumer will surely return a $40 light bulb which does not meet their expectations and it will be a long time before they buy it again.
Name: j. swanson Posted: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:10
The mere fact that LSG would exploit a loophole because it legally could shows just what kind of slimy outfit it is. I hope the FTC takes a sharp look at LSG as it has with LOA. Putting a few "chipheads" heads on pikes are needed to clean up the DIY sector of the lighting industry. The DIY market is what gives LED's a bad name. If Home Depot, Loews, and Wal Mart, and others want to do consumers a favor, then they need to crack the whip on their LED suppliers and not participate in the dishonesty for profit. Shame on LSG!
Name: j. creveling Posted: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:03
So when you get your lamp as a user how do you know its 200 lumen or 250 lumen or 300 lumen. Most users have no equipment to test the bulb for total output.
LINKS
Channels
Programs, Funding, Regional Initiatives
Related Stories
AC-DC rocks the boat for LM-79 and LED replacement lamps
FTC sued Lights of America over deceptive claims for LED lamps
The Home Depot brings the first affordable LED bulbs to market
The Home Depot sells Ecosmart LED lamps made by Lighting Science Group
the Lighting Facts program acted quickly
Author
Tim Whitaker and Brian Owen
Copyright © 2007-2012 PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, OK. All Rights Reserved. LEDs Magazine is part of PennWell's Technology Group, which also includes:
Designed by Kestrel Web Services