LEDs MAGAZINEOUTDOOR LIGHTINGINDOOR LIGHTING
LOGIN | SUBSCRIBE
LEDs Magazine
   HOME   ARTICLESNEWSPRODUCTSBUYERS GUIDEEVENTSADVERTISECONTACT US
MAGAZINENEWSLETTERSJOBSTOPIC CENTERRESOURCE CENTER
 ARTICLES
< Previous  Next >  Contents (August 2008)
Share |
Energy Star Wars: the Phantom Menace
The decision by EPA to include LEDs in its Energy Star specification for residential lighting fixtures has resulted in widespread disapproval. Tim Whitaker and Brian Owen report.
The big story of the past month has been the controversy over Energy Star criteria for solid-state lighting, or “Energy Star Wars” as our magazine dubbed the dispute between two branches of the U.S. government, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Energy (DOE). To say this has caused uproar is an understatement, and we have certainly devoted many column inches (or the web equivalent) to a subject we feel strongly about. Some of the key happenings, and links to the appropriate stories on our website, can be found in the Timeline sidebar.

Energy Star is a voluntary labelling scheme that recognizes energy-efficiency products that meet criteria set by either EPA or DOE. Before getting into the details of the dispute, it’s worth noting that this is mainly relevant to the U.S. and Canadian markets. Lighting designers at a meeting in mid- June in the UK were not much interested in the news from across the pond. But perhaps they should have been; one of the biggest benefits of the Energy Star program is, through the promotion of energy-efficient products, to prevent the insidious infiltration of low-quality products into the marketplace. The phantom menace indeed. This is a particular problem for the SSL market, at a time when the DOE’s own CALiPER program — which tests commercially available SSL luminaires - has highlighted a worrying tendency for some manufacturers to vastly overstate the performance of their products. To quote Kevin Dowling of Philips/Color Kinetics, “Nothing will kill an industry faster than expectations that cannot be met. Performance must be realistic and factual.”

+++++++

This article was published in the July/August 2008 issue of LEDs Magazine.

To read the full version of this article, please visit our Magazine page, where you can download FREE electronic PDF versions of all issues of LEDs Magazine.

You can also request a print copy of LEDs Magazine (available by paid subscription) and sign up for our free weekly email newsletter.

About the Author 
Tim Whitaker is the Editor of LEDs Magazine.

Brian Owen, a contributing editor of LEDs Magazine, is also the Program Advisor to greenTbiz, which facilitates the LED City Toronto initiative. He is actively involved in the development and operation of energy conservation programs for government, municipalities and utilities and specializes in capacity building, commercialization and market transformation. greenTbiz provides energy conservation and environmental awareness programs to the small business sector in Toronto, Canada.

COMMENTS
There are currently no comments.
August 2008
August 2008
LINKS
Channels
Related Links
Download all issues of LEDs Magazine (requires FREE subscription)
Table of Contents: July/August 2008
Author
Tim Whitaker, Brian Owen
Copyright © 2007-2012 PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, OK. All Rights Reserved. LEDs Magazine is part of PennWell's Technology Group, which also includes:
Designed by Kestrel Web Services